Drug Distributors Win Groundbreaking Opioid Lawsuit in West Virginia
Huntington and Cabell County alleged that the three distributors failed to maintain controls that would have prevented the oversupply of addictive substances like Oxycodone. At trial, attorneys for McKesson argued that holding the companies liable would "force distributors to second-guess doctors' prescribing decisions."Read more about "Drug Distributors Win Groundbreaking Opioid Lawsuit in West Virginia"
Supreme Court Allows Biden Administration to End 'Remain in Mexico' Program
On its final day of decisions for the 2021-2022 term, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Biden administration could end the Trump-era policy that required asylum seekers to stay on the Mexican side of the southern border while they waited for approval.Read more about "Supreme Court Allows Biden Administration to End 'Remain in Mexico' Program"
SCOTUS Limits EPA Emission Control Powers
In a decision that could open the door to broader administrative restrictions in other areas, the U.S. Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency's powers to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants. The 6-3 ruling in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency split firmly across ideological lines. The agency went further than the power Congress granted it in the 1970 Clean Air Act by creating its own regulatory scheme to cap carbon emissions, the court ruled.Read more about "SCOTUS Limits EPA Emission Control Powers"
Supreme Court Gives States Expanded Power Over Native Tribes
Although Governor Stitt assailed the court with numerous petitions challenging McGirt, Castro-Huerta's case was the only one it agreed to take up. And this decision only affects the state's ability to criminally prosecute non-Natives in "Indian country." But, it does signal a major shift in the way the court addresses issues of Native sovereignty.Read more about "Supreme Court Gives States Expanded Power Over Native Tribes"
A Touchdown for Religious Expression
In a win for religious conservatives, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a high-school football coach has a First Amendment right to pray at the 50-yard line following games. The court reversed a lower court's determination that the coach's employer, a public school district, could not permit his prayer because of the very same amendment. The ruling highlights a conflict between First Amendment rights: the right to freely practice and express your religion in public and the right of others to be free from a state-established church. In this case, the court resolved this conflict in favor of an individual's right to religious expression.Read more about "A Touchdown for Religious Expression"
Looking at Future Supreme Court Abortion Fights
Even with almost two months to prepare, the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, which overturned Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood, contained a lot of information to digest. While Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion included relatively little new information from the leaked draft, the concurring opinions have opened the door to a lot of speculation. Below are four potential legal issues involving abortion that could make their way back up to the Supreme Court.Read more about "Looking at Future Supreme Court Abortion Fights"
More Recent News
Greedy AssociatesHow Much Experience Do You Need To Become a Judge?
Practice of LawCan Sentient AI Break the Law?
Greedy AssociatesHow to Proactively Encourage Attorney Well-Being (Before It's a Problem)