Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

Edu v. Holder, No. 06-72609

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Female Genital Mutilation-Related BIA Review Petition

In Edu v. Holder, No. 06-72609, a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of petitioner's application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and from its denial of her motion to reopen, the court granted the petition in part where there was no basis for returning petitioner to a country where she must either give up her appropriate political behavior or face a substantial risk of torture.

As the court wrote:  "Josephine Edu, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of her application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and from its denial of her motion to reopen. Deferral was denied on the basis that Edu could avoid torture by ceasing to exercise her political rights, and that the mere fact that she had endured female genital mutilation was insufficient to support CAT relief."

Related Resources

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard