Defendant's drug manufacturing conviction is affirmed where: 1) defendant could not show that the police invaded an area in which he possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy when they walked up his driveway and attached a tracking device to his vehicle; and 2) the police did not conduct an impermissible search of defendant's car by monitoring its location with mobile tracking devices.
Read US v. Pineda-Moreno, No. 08-30385
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 5, 2009
Filed January 11, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge O'Scannlain
Counsel
For Appellant:
Harrison Latto, Portland, OR
For Appellee:
Amy E. Potter and Judith R. Harper, Assistant United States Attorneys for the District of Oregon, Medford, OR
