Skip to main content

Shrestha v. Holder, No. 08-74751

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a petition for review of the denial of petitioner's asylum application, the petition is denied where: 1) the record's demonstration that petitioner's unresponsiveness was a pattern throughout the hearing was one of the circumstances that the REAL ID Act entitled the BIA to consider in assessing petitioner's credibility; and 2) petitioner's inability to consistently describe the underlying events that gave rise to his alleged fear of persecution was an important factor that could be relied upon by the Immigration Judge in making an adverse credibility determination.

Read Shrestha v. Holder, No. 08-74751

Appellate Information

Submitted December 10, 2009

Filed January 5, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Gould

Counsel

For Petitioner:

Patrick Cantor, Buttar & Cantor LLP, Tukwila, WA

For Respondent:

Tony West, Anthony C. Payne and Corlette J. Winston, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard