Skip to main content

Farrakhan v. Gregoire, No. 06-35669

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a Voting Rights Act (VRA) action by minority citizens of Washington state who lost their right to vote pursuant to the state's felon disenfranchisement provision, summary judgment for defendants is reversed where: 1) plaintiffs had standing because a decision invalidating Washington's felon disenfranchisement provision would redress plaintiffs' injury in that it would restore their right to vote; 2) a failure to show that a state had a history of discriminatory voting practices did not negate a showing under the VRA that the current voting practice at issue was discriminatory; and 3) plaintiffs demonstrated that racial minorities were overrepresented in the felon population based upon factors that could not be explained by non-racial reasons.

Read Farrakhan v. Gregoire, No. 06-35669

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted April 8, 2008

Filed January 5, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Tashima

Dissent by Judge McKeown

Counsel

For Appellants:

Ryan P. Haygood, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., New York, NY

For Appellees:

Carol Murphy, Deputy Solicitor General, Olympia, WA

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard