The district court's restitution order imposed upon defendants for conspiracy to violate civil rights relating to a prostitution scheme is vacated where restitution for "lost income" under 18 U.S.C. section 3663 was not the same as disgorgement of all of defendants' ill-gotten gains from the victims' forced prostitution.
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 15, 2009
Filed December 3, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Graber
Counsel
For Appellant:
Peter C. Wolff, Jr. and Pamela E. Tamashiro, Honolulu, HI
For Appellee:
Karen L. Stevens, United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC
