Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

NGM Ins. Co. v. Blakely Pumping, Inc., No. 09-1655

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an action by an insurer seeking a declaration that it was not obligated to defend its insured in a personal injury action, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where the policy at issue did not cover defendant's auto under any circumstances and, therefore, the district court erred in finding that New York Insurance Law section 3420(d)(2) required plaintiff to timely disclaim coverage.

Read NGM Ins. Co. v. Blakely Pumping, Inc., No. 09-1655

Appellate Information

Argued: December 10, 2009

Decided: February 1, 2010

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Appellant:

Haydn J. Brill, Brill & Associates, P.C., New York, NY

For Appellee:

Robert D. Cook, Cook, Netter, Cloonan, Kurtz & Murphy, P.C., Kingston, New York

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard