Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Paulk, No. 08-50229

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Defendant's drug possession sentence is affirmed, where Defendant was sentenced pursuant to a statutory mandatory minimum, and thus could not be entitled to a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2).

Read US v. Paulk, No. 08-50229

Appellate Information

Submitted February 2, 2009

Filed June 24, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Appellant:

Carlton F. Gunn, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA

For Appellee:

Daniel B. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard