Skip to main content

Havensure, LLC v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., No 09-3367

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an action for tortious interference by an insurance broker against an insurer (Prudential), district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Prudential is affirmed as Prudential's interference was privileged as a matter of Ohio law.     

Read Havensure, LLC v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., No 09-3367

Appellate Information

Argued: January 12, 2010

Decided and Filed: February 12, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge  Boggs

Counsel

For Appellant:  Robert R. Sparks, Parry Deering Futscher & Sparks, PSC.

For Appellee:    Michael Nathan Ungar, Ulmer & Berne, LLP

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard