Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Johnson v. Mitchell, No. 00-3350

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

District court's conviction of defendant for aggravated robbery and aggravated murder and sentence of death is affirmed in part as to the conviction, but reversed in part as to the sentence where petitioner's trial attorney did not provide his client with effective assistance of counsel during the penalty phase of a second trial, specifically, by failing to meaningfully investigate and to present any mitigation evidence. 

Read Johnson v. Mitchell, No. 00-3350

Appellate Information

Argued: December 6, 2007

Decided and Filed: November 4, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Daughtrey

Counsel

For Appellant:  Timothy F. Sweeney, Law Office of Timothy Farrell Sweeney, Cleveland, Ohio

For Appellee:  Charles L. Wille, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard