Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Warman, No. 05-4416

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Defendant's drug conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence independent of hearsay statements showed that defendant was a member of the drug conspiracy at issue; and 2) any potential error caused by trying multiple conspiracies under a single indictment did not influence the fairness of the trial.

Read US v. Warman, No. 05-4416

Appellate Information

Argued: April 23, 2009

Decided and Filed: August 18, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Cole

Counsel

For Appellant:

Paul L. Nelson, Federal Public Defender's Office, Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI

For Appellee:

Ava M.R. Dustin, Assistant United States Attorney, Toledo, OH

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard