In a drug and firearm prosecution, the denial of plaintiff's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion claiming that the district court erred in deciding his 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion for sentence modification without granting him an evidentiary hearing is affirmed where plaintiff's claims required authorization under section 2255(h) as a second or successive motion.
Read In re: Lindsey, No. 09-3184
Appellate Information
Filed September 16, 2009
Judges
Per Curiam
By Mark Wilson, Esq. | Last updated on
James White pleaded guilty to violating the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) after he failed to update his sex offender registration when...
By William Vogeler, Esq. | Last updated on
Two pharmacists pleaded guilty to felony charges for illegally distributing controlled substances in Colorado. Stanley G. Callas and Scott Alan Eskanos entered...
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on
For Roberto Roman, the criminal justice system must seem unreal. Reading the recent Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in his case, it's easy to see why.
By Mark Wilson, Esq. | Last updated on
James White pleaded guilty to violating the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) after he failed to update his sex offender registration when...
By William Vogeler, Esq. | Last updated on
Two pharmacists pleaded guilty to felony charges for illegally distributing controlled substances in Colorado. Stanley G. Callas and Scott Alan Eskanos entered...
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on
For Roberto Roman, the criminal justice system must seem unreal. Reading the recent Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in his case, it's easy to see why.