Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

1680 Prop. Trust v. Newman Trust, No. B207613

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Follow us

In plaintiffs' suit against the defendant-Newman Trust for breach of fiduciary duty based on fraud, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed as the Code of Civ. Proc. section 366.2 period of limitations is applicable to fraud claims based on statements of the decedent on behalf of a trust of which he was trustor and trustee, even though the action is against the successor trustee.     

Read 1680 Prop. Trust v. Newman Trust, No. B207613 [HTML]

Read 1680 Prop. Trust v. Newman Trust, No. B207613 [PDF]

Filed November 17, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Mosk

Counsel
For Appellant: Law Offices of Richard A. Love, Richard A. Love, and Beth A. Shenfeld

For Appellee:  The Vittal Law Firm and J. Anthony Vittal

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED

Related Articles

Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship Under the 14th Amendment in Trump v. Barbara

By Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Reviewed by Laura Temme, Esq. | Last updated on

There are major Supreme Court decisions every term. But Trump v. Barbara, according to Justice Samuel Alito, is “one of the most important decisions in the...

Supreme Court Rules the Border Is the Line, Literally

By Vaidehi Mehta, Esq. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

Does a person seeking asylum need to set foot on U.S. soil before the federal government is legally obligated to process them? In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the...

Supreme Court Narrows Hawaii’s Private-Property Gun Ban

By Vaidehi Mehta, Esq. | Reviewed by Bridget Molitor, JD | Last updated on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 25, 2026 decision in Wolford v. Lopez held that Hawaii’s so-called “vampire law” (Act 52, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134‑9.5(a)), which...

Blog Posts 1 of 3

Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship Under the 14th Amendment in Trump v. Barbara

By Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Reviewed by Laura Temme, Esq. | Last updated on

There are major Supreme Court decisions every term. But Trump v. Barbara, according to Justice Samuel Alito, is “one of the most important decisions in the...

Supreme Court Rules the Border Is the Line, Literally

By Vaidehi Mehta, Esq. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

Does a person seeking asylum need to set foot on U.S. soil before the federal government is legally obligated to process them? In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the...

Supreme Court Narrows Hawaii’s Private-Property Gun Ban

By Vaidehi Mehta, Esq. | Reviewed by Bridget Molitor, JD | Last updated on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 25, 2026 decision in Wolford v. Lopez held that Hawaii’s so-called “vampire law” (Act 52, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134‑9.5(a)), which...

Need Help With a Legal Issue?

Contact a qualified attorney to find out your options for navigating the best path forward.

Enter information. (Required)

Find a Do-It-Yourself Solution

Copied to clipboard