Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

Federal Courts

Filter by Category

Federal Courts Criminal Matters

Criminal Matters

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

US v. Kyles, No. 06-4196, involved defendant's appeal from the district court's orders amending his restitution schedule while he was incarcerated.  The...

Federal Courts Southern New England Tel. Co. v. Global Naps Inc., No. 08-4518

Southern New England Tel. Co. v. Global Naps Inc., No. 08-4518

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Southern New England Tel. Co. v. Global Naps Inc., No. 08-4518, involved an action by a telephone company seeking payment for services rendered pursuant to its...

Federal Courts Telephone Consumer Protection Act Action, and Employment Matter

Telephone Consumer Protection Act Action, and Employment Matter

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Bessemer Trust Co., N.A. v. Branin, No. 08-2462, involved an action alleging that defendant illegally solicited his former clients at plaintiff.  The...

Federal Courts GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. BabyCenter, L.L.C., No. 09-2790

GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. BabyCenter, L.L.C., No. 09-2790

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. BabyCenter, L.L.C., No. 09-2790, involved petitioner's appeal from the district court's order granting a motion to disqualify...

Federal Courts Denial of Inmate's In Forma Pauperis Motion Reversed, and Civil Procedure Matter

Denial of Inmate's In Forma Pauperis Motion Reversed, and Civil Procedure Matter

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In Chavis v. Chappius, No. 07-2304, the court vacated denial of plaintiff-inmate's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, holding that 1) a complaint and a...

Federal Courts Friedman v. Rehal, No. 08-0297

Friedman v. Rehal, No. 08-0297

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In Friedman v. Rehal, No. 08-0297, a sexual abuse prosecution, the court affirmed the denial of petitioner's habeas petition, holding that 1) the fact that...

Copied to clipboard