Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Entmt. Inc., No. 07-56110

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a copyright, trademark, and trade dress infringement action, judgment as a matter of law for defendant on copyright and trade dress infringement claims is affirmed where: 1) defendant did not timely move for judgment as a matter of law, but the time limit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) is not jurisdictional; and 2) plaintiff failed to demonstrate that defendant had access to plaintiff's copyrighted works or that plaintiff's trade dress had acquired secondary meaning.

Read Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Entmt. Inc., No. 07-56110

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted December 9, 2008

Filed September 16, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Pregerson

Counsel

For Appellant:

Michael W. Quade, Quade & Associates, San Diego, CA

For Appellee:

Craig Holden, MGA Entertainment, Inc., Van Nuys, CA

Was this helpful?

Know Your Rights Before You Decide What’s Next

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard