Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Entmt. Inc., No. 07-56110

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In a copyright, trademark, and trade dress infringement action, judgment as a matter of law for defendant on copyright and trade dress infringement claims is affirmed where: 1) defendant did not timely move for judgment as a matter of law, but the time limit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) is not jurisdictional; and 2) plaintiff failed to demonstrate that defendant had access to plaintiff's copyrighted works or that plaintiff's trade dress had acquired secondary meaning.

Read Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Entmt. Inc., No. 07-56110

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted December 9, 2008

Filed September 16, 2009


Opinion by Judge Pregerson


For Appellant:

Michael W. Quade, Quade & Associates, San Diego, CA

For Appellee:

Craig Holden, MGA Entertainment, Inc., Van Nuys, CA

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard