Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Bauer v. MRAG Americas, Inc., No. 09-17254

By FindLaw Staff on October 28, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Tort Action by Fisheries Observer

In Bauer v. MRAG Americas, Inc., No. 09-17254, an action by a fisheries observer aboard a fishing boat who was injured by a cable on the vessel that snapped and hit her, the court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint where 16 U.S.C. section 1383a(e)(7)(A)'s immunity provision precluded a negligence suit by a federal observer who was injured while taking a restroom break.

As the court wrote:  "Congress passed the Marine Mammal Protection Act ("MMPA"), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1361 et seq., in response to the concern that marine mammals "are, or may be, in danger of extinction or depletion as a result of" human activities. Id. § 1361(1). As part of the protection efforts under both the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1801 et seq., and the MMPA, the Secretary of Commerce may require vessels to have observers aboard to monitor compliance with fishing regulations and to "obtain statistically reliable information on the species and number of marine mammals incidentally taken in the fishery." Id. § 1383a(e)(1); see also id. § 1821(h)."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard