Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

Case Involving Inmate's Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Harvey v. Jordan, No. 07-15023, concerned an action claiming that corrections officers used excessive force and violated plaintiff-inmate's due process rights in the course of removing him from his cell.  The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal of the action in part, on the ground that, because plaintiff did not file a grievance until well after the applicable fifteen-day period had ended, he did not properly exhaust his administrative remedies on the excessive force claim.  However, the court reversed in part, holding that an inmate had no obligation to appeal from a grant of relief, or a partial grant that satisfied him, in order to exhaust his administrative remedies, and it was not his responsibility to ensure that prison officials actually provide the relief that they promised.

As the court wrote:  "Plaintiff Quillie Harvey is a prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison. Prison officials used pepper spray to extract him from his cell on July 29, 2004, during a building-wide search of all prisoners' cells. This appeal involves two claims arising from that cell extraction."

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard