Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Clouthier v. Contra Costa, No. 07-16703

By FindLaw Staff on January 14, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging that a mental health specialist, two sheriff's deputies, and a county violated the Fourteenth Amendment due process rights of plaintiffs by failing to prevent their son's suicide while he was in pretrial detention, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part where, as to certain defendants, the evidence was insufficient to allow a jury to conclude that they knew the decedent was suicidal and deliberately ignored that risk.  However, the order is reversed in part where, in light of a defendant's understanding that the decedent was not "out of the woods" yet, and in light of the clearly established law at the time, a reasonable mental health professional could not have thought it was lawful to remove key suicide prevention measures put in place by a prior staff member.

Read Clouthier v. Contra Costa, No. 07-16703

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 10, 2009

Filed January 14, 2010


Opinion by Judge Ikuta

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Block


For Appellant:

Stan Casper and Thomas A. Seaton, Casper, Meadows, Schwartz & Cook, Walnut Creek, CA

For Appellees:

Janet L. Holmes, Office of County Counsel, Martinez, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard