Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg, No. 08-35966

By FindLaw Staff on January 31, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action claiming that plaintiff was entitled to part of an amount refunded by the Federal Trade Commission following a judgment against plaintiff and defendants, dismissal of the action as untimely is affirmed where defendant's actions in raising the reserve requirement of entities partially controlled by defendant gave rise to plaintiff's claims in 2000, and therefore the statute of limitations began to run at that time.

Read Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg, No. 08-35966

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 14, 2009

Filed January 29, 2010


Opinion by Judge Cudahy


For Appellant:

Ernst Leonard, Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P., Dallas, TX

For Appellees:

Derek A. Newman and Derek Linke, Newman & Newman, Attorneys at Law, Seattle, WA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard