Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Cox v. Ayers, No. 07-99010

By FindLaw Staff on December 11, 2009 12:58 PM

In a capital habeas matter, the denial of petitioner's habeas petition is affirmed where: 1) petitioner was not prejudiced by the trial court's decision to shackle him during the guilt phase of the trial; 2) counsel's thorough mitigation investigation was more than reasonable; 3) further evidence about petitioner's childhood and gang activity would have suggested violent propensities at odds with counsel's goal of portraying petitioner as less culpable; and 4) the proposed additional evidence was mostly cumulative of the information already presented at the penalty phase trial.

Read Cox v. Ayers, No. 07-99010

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2009

Filed December 10, 2009


Opinion by Judge Graber


For Appellant:

Jeannie R. Sternberg, Habeas Corpus Resource Center, San Francisco, CA

For Appellee:

Jamie L. Fuster, Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Los Angeles, CA

Copied to clipboard