Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc., No. 09-35183

By FindLaw Staff on January 13, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action claiming that defendant collection agency violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by charging a usurious rate of interest, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the creditor's assessment of finance charges was not a forbearance, and therefore there was no Washington usury law violation; and 2) the complaint correctly calculated the total debt plaintiff owed, accurately stated the principal owed, and accurately listed the total non-principal amount owed inclusive of interest and finance charges.

Read Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc., No. 09-35183

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2009

Filed January 13, 2010


Opinion by Judge Gould


For Appellant:

Michael J. Beyer, Spokane, WA

For Appellee:

Christopher J. Kerley, Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S., Spokane, WA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard