Dupree v. Holman Prof'l. Counseling Ctrs., No. 07-55617
In an ERISA action for health benefits, judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff's stay at a residential treatment center that had no contract with defendant-insurer was not covered under plaintiff's health plan.
Read Dupree v. Holman Prof'l. Counseling Ctrs., No. 07-55617
Argued and Submitted October 22, 2008
Filed July 29, 2009
Opinion by Judge Hall
Dissent by Judge Pregerson
Lisa S. Kantor, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA
Robert C. Bohner, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Los Angeles, CA
Michael A. Vanic, Reish Luftman Reicher & Cohen, Los Angeles, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.