Skip to main content

Dupree v. Holman Prof'l. Counseling Ctrs., No. 07-55617

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an ERISA action for health benefits, judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff's stay at a residential treatment center that had no contract with defendant-insurer was not covered under plaintiff's health plan.

Read Dupree v. Holman Prof'l. Counseling Ctrs., No. 07-55617

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2008

Filed July 29, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hall

Dissent by Judge Pregerson

Counsel

For Appellants:

Lisa S. Kantor, Kantor & Kantor, Northridge, CA

For Appellees:

Robert C. Bohner, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Los Angeles, CA

Michael A. Vanic, Reish Luftman Reicher & Cohen, Los Angeles, CA

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard