EEOC v. Go Daddy Software, Inc., No. 07-16190
In an action by the EEOC claiming that defendant terminated an employee in retaliation for engaging in protected activity, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that plaintiff complained of discrimination based on his religion; and 2) the jury could reasonably conclude that the employee had the option of returning to his original sales position at defendant company.
Read EEOC v. Go Daddy Software, Inc., No. 07-16190
Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher
Dissent by Judge Noonan
Fred W. Alvarez, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA
Michael J. Nader, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA
James M. Tucker, EEOC, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.