Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Gossett v. Czech, No. 06-16973

By FindLaw Staff on September 09, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that defendant unlawfully took a portion of plaintiff-committed inmate's Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits each month and applied the money to partially defray the cost of plaintiff's care at a state hospital, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where 38 U.S.C. section 5301(a)(1), when read in combination with pertinent regulations such as 38 C.F.R. section 13.71, does not prohibit direct payments of VA benefits to a state hospital for ongoing veteran patient care.

Read Gossett v. Czech, No. 06-16973

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted June 4, 2009

Filed September 9, 2009


Opinion by Judge Smith


For Appellant:

Paul Gossett, pro se

Charles C. Lifland, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA

For Appellee:

Harry T. Gower, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard