Hamilton v. Ayers, No. 06-99008
In a capital habeas matter, the denial of the petition is affirmed as to petitioner's guilt where: 1) petitioner failed to claim potential or actual bias on the part of a juror; 2) there was no reasonable probability that the outcome of the guilt phase of the trial would have been different had suppressed evidence regarding a witness's plea agreement been introduced. However, the denial of the petition is reversed as to the penalty phase where trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to investigate and present to the jury the wealth of classic mitigating evidence that was available to him.
Read Hamilton v. Ayers, No. 06-99008
Argued and Submitted January 20, 2009
Filed September 18, 2009
Opinion by Judge Wardlaw
Katherine L. Hart, Law Offices of Katherine L. Hart, Fresno, CA
Saor E. Stetler, Law Offices of Saor E. Stetler, Mill Valley, CA
Catherine Chatman, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.