Skip to main content

Hardisty v. Astrue, No. 08-35919

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an appeal from the Social Security Commission's denial of supplemental security income benefits to plaintiff, the district court's denial of attorney's fees to plaintiff is affirmed where a plaintiff may not be awarded attorneys' fees against the U.S. under the Equal Access to Justice Act with respect to issues not reached by a district court in reversing a federal agency's decision.

Read Hardisty v. Astrue, No. 08-35919

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 9, 2009

Filed January 25, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge O'Scannlain

Counsel

For Appellant:

Ralph Wilborn, Wilborn Law Office, P.C., Oregon City, OR

For Appellee:

Kathryn A. Miller and Britannia I. Hobbs, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Seattle, WA

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard