Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Harris v. Amgen, Inc., No. 08-55389

By FindLaw Staff on July 14, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action alleging that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA in the operation of a corporation's retirement plans, the dismissal of the complaint is reversed where plaintiff had standing as an ERISA plan participant to seek relief under 29 U.S.C. section 1132(a)(2), despite having withdrawn all of his assets from his plan.

Read Harris v. Amgen, Inc., No. 08-55389

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted May 8, 2009

Filed July 14, 2009


Opinion by Judge Gould


For Appellants:

Mark C. Rifkin, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, San Diego, CA

For Appellees:

Steven O. Kramer, Mayer Brown LLP, Los Angeles, CA

Robert P. Davis, Mayer Brown LLP, Los Angeles, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard