Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

Hillis v. Heineman, No. 09-17040

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Dismissal for Improper Venue Affirmed

In Hillis v. Heineman, No. 09-17040, a securities fraud action, the court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint for improper venue where a defendant who files a counterclaim or a third-party complaint does not waive the asserted defense of improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3).

 

As the court wrote:  "We must decide whether a defendant who files a counter-claim or a third-party complaint waives the asserted defense of improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). We hold that filing a counterclaim or a third-party complaint does not waive the defense of improper venue."

Related Resources

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard