Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Hoffman v. Tonnemacher, No. 08-16166

By FindLaw Staff on January 21, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. section 1395dd(a), based on an emergency room physician's failure to diagnose plaintiff's bacterial infection, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where the district court had discretion to entertain successive motions for summary judgment and did not abuse its discretion in permitting defendants to file a successive motion.

Read Hoffman v. Tonnemacher, No. 08-16166


Opinion by Judge Graber

Appellate Information

For Appellant:

Kevin G. Little, Fresno, CA

For Appellee:

Lara M. Krieger, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP, Los Angeles, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard