Skip to main content

Irigoyen-Briones v. Holder, No. 07-71806

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioner's motion to reconsider its rejection of petitioner's appeal as being untimely filed, the petition is denied where 8 C.F.R. section 1003.38(b) is ambiguous regarding the BIA's jurisdiction to consider late filings, and the BIA's interpretation barring petitioner's filing was not plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the language of the regulation.

Read Irigoyen-Briones v. Holder, No. 07-71806

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 10, 2009

Filed September 29, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Smith

Dissent by Judge Kleinfeld

Counsel

For Petitioner:

Charles E. Nichol, Law Offices of Charles E. Nichol, San Francisco, CA

For Respondent:

Charles Canter and Ronald E. LeFevre, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard