Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Los Angeles v. Kern, No. 07-56564

By FindLaw Staff on September 09, 2009 4:55 PM

In a dormant Commerce Clause action by recyclers challenging a local ordinance banning a particular method of waste disposal, summary judgment for plaintiffs is reversed in part with instructions to dismiss where the recyclers' injury was not even marginally related to the interests the Commerce Clause seeks to safeguard. The ruling is vacated and remanded in part where the circuit court's dismissal of the federal constitutional claim might materially alter the district court's decision to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' preemption claim.

Read Los Angeles v. Kern, No. 07-56564

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 2, 2009

Submission vacated March 19, 2009

Resubmitted September 9, 2009

Filed September 9, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge O'Scannlain

Counsel

For Appellants:

Steven L. Mayer, Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, San Francisco, CA

Adam Polakoff, Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, San Francisco, CA

For Appellees:

Thomas S. Hixon, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Los Angeles, CA

Marc R. Bruner, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Los Angeles, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard