Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Mansourian v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., No. 08-16330

By FindLaw Staff on February 08, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and Title IX action against a university arising after the university required women on the co-ed wrestling team to compete against men under men's rules, summary judgment for defendants is reversed where: 1) plaintiffs were not required to give the university notice of, and an opportunity to rectify, the specific violation to make out a Title IX claim; 2) the record did not contain undisputed facts showing a history and continuing practice of program expansion that was responsive to women's interests; and 3) as plaintiffs were students and therefore subject to the policy that allegedly discriminated on the basis of sex at the time they filed their complaint, their section 1983 claim was not time-barred.

Read Mansourian v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., No. 08-16330

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2009

Filed February 8, 2010


Opinion by Judge Berzon


For Appellants:

Noreen Farrell, Debra Smith and James C. Sturdevant, San Francisco, CA

For Appellees:

Nancy J. Sheehan, Sacramento, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard