Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Mayfield v. US, No. 07-35865

By FindLaw Staff on December 11, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action brought by a former suspect in the 2004 Madrid train bombings and his family claiming that several provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) as amended by the PATRIOT Act were unconstitutional, judgment for plaintiff is reversed where, in light of the limited remedy available to plaintiff under a settlement agreement with the government, he did not have standing to pursue his Fourth Amendment claim because his injuries already had been substantially redressed by the settlement, and a declaratory judgment would not likely impact him or his family.

Read Mayfield v. US, No. 07-35865

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2009

Filed December 10, 2009


Opinion by Judge Paez


For Appellant:

Douglas Letter and Scott McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC

For Appellees:

Elden Rosenthal, Rosenthal & Greene, P.C., Portland, OR

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard