Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Narouz v. Charter Comms., LLC, No. 07-56005

By FindLaw Staff on January 19, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a class action for unpaid wages, the district court's denial of the parties' motion to certify a class for settlement purposes is vacated where: 1) the voluntary dismissal by a class representative of his personal claims in a putative class action lawsuit did not render moot his appeal of the denial of class certification; and 2) the district court erred in denying class certification without providing any findings or providing any analysis of the Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 factors.

Read Narouz v. Charter Comms., LLC, No. 07-56005

Appellate Information

Argued November 17, 2008

Submitted December 1, 2009

Filed January 15, 2010


Opinion by Judge Smith


For Appellants:

Stephen M. Harris, Knapp, Peterson & Clarke, Glendale, CA

For Appellees:

Steven D. Allison and Mandana Massoumi, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Irvine, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard