Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Parth v. Pomona Valley Hosp. Med. Ctr., No. 08-55022

By FindLaw Staff on October 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action alleging that defendant's use of different base hourly rates violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by denying unionized employees overtime pay, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, when an employer changes its shift schedule to accommodate its employees' scheduling desires, the mere fact that pay rates changed, between the old and new scheduling schemes in an attempt to keep overall pay revenue-neutral, does not establish a violation of the FLSA's overtime pay requirements.

Read Parth v. Pomona Valley Hosp. Med. Ctr., No. 08-55022

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2009

Filed October 22, 2009


Opinion by Judge Smith


For Appellant:

Frank J. Coughlin, Santa Ana, CA

For Appellee:

Douglas R. Hart and Beth Anne Scheel, Los Angeles, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard