In an action challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8, a California ballot initiative restricting the definition of marriage to the union of a man and a woman, denial of a prospective intervenor's application to intervene is affirmed where the existing parties would adequately represent its interests.
Read Perry v. Prop. 8 Official Proponents, No. 09-16959
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted November 4, 2009
Filed November 19, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge McKeown
Counsel
For Appellant:
Mary E. McAlister and Mathew D. Staver, Liberty Counsel, Lynchburg, VA
For Appellees:
Matthew D. McGill and Theodore B. Olson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC
Charles J. Cooper and Howard C. Nielson, Cooper and Kirk, PLLC, Washington, DC
