Perry v. Prop. 8 Official Proponents, No. 09-16959
In an action challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8, a California ballot initiative restricting the definition of marriage to the union of a man and a woman, denial of a prospective intervenor's application to intervene is affirmed where the existing parties would adequately represent its interests.
Read Perry v. Prop. 8 Official Proponents, No. 09-16959
Argued and Submitted November 4, 2009
Filed November 19, 2009
Opinion by Judge McKeown
Mary E. McAlister and Mathew D. Staver, Liberty Counsel, Lynchburg, VA
Matthew D. McGill and Theodore B. Olson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC
Charles J. Cooper and Howard C. Nielson, Cooper and Kirk, PLLC, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.