Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Peterson v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, No. 08-17756

By FindLaw Staff on December 03, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Iran Immune from Judgment Enforcement Under FSIA

In Peterson v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, No. 08-17756, plaintiffs' appeal from the district court's order denying plaintiffs' motion to assign the rights of a French debtor of Iran to plaintiffs, on the basis that Iran's rights to payment from the debtor were immune under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), the court affirmed where 1) the court could not require a defendant to affirmatively plead foreign sovereign immunity from suit, since a court must decide immunity even if a defendant does not appear; and 2) Iran's rights to payment from the debtor did not constitute "property in the United States" under 28 U.S.C. section 1610(a).


As the court wrote:  "Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against Iran for $2,656,944,877. When it became clear that Iran was not going to comply with the judgment, plaintiffs moved the district court to order Iran to assign to the plaintiffs, as judgment creditors, Iran's rights to payment from CMA CGM. CMA CGM is a French shipping company that allegedly frequents Iranian ports and pays Iran for use of its harbors and for providing its ships with bunkering oil."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard