Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In a murder prosecution, dismissal of a habeas petition as untimely is affirmed where: 1) the Nevada Supreme Court's order dismissing petitioner's appeal as untimely did not constitute "the conclusion of direct review" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d)(1)(A); and 2) even with the benefit of statutory tolling pursuant to Section 2244(d)(2), petitioner's petition was untimely by 192 days.
Read Randle v. Crawford, No. 08-15657
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted March 9, 2009
Submission Vacated and Deferred March 12, 2009
Resubmitted August 4, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Wallace
Counsel
For Appellant:
Franny A. Forsman, Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV
For Appellees:
Dennis C. Wilson, Deputy Attorney General, Las Vegas, NV
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: