Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Schultz v. US, No. 08-17304

By FindLaw Staff on February 09, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an appeal from the district court's denial of appellant's motion to intervene as of right in a securities fraud action, the order is affirmed where appellant was improperly attempting to enforce a restitution order in a parallel criminal action in a manner outside the scope of 18 U.S.C. section 3664(m)(1)(B).

Read Schultz v. US, No. 08-17304

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted December 11, 2009

Filed February 9, 2010


Opinion by Judge Lynn


For Appellant:

Richard M. Goldstein, Goldstein, Tanen & Trench, P.A., Miami, FL

For Appellee:

Evan Jason Smith, Esquire, Brodsky & smith, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard