Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, No. 07-35754

By FindLaw Staff on June 17, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action challenging certain fishery management regulations, the dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where: 1) the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act's (MSA) limitations period barred Plaintiffs' direct challenge to the regulations; and 2) Plaintiffs' failure to act claim was an impermissible attempt to recast its direct challenge to the regulations so as to avoid the MSA's shortened limitations period.

Read the full decision in Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, , No. 07-35754.

Appellate Information:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2008 -- Seattle, Washington
Filed June 17, 2009


Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan


Leonard J. Feldman, Michael T. Shein, Kevin P. Sullivan, Seattle, Washington, on behalf of appellants Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. and the Non-AFA Processors Association.

Anna T. Katselas, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on behalf of appellees Gary F. Locke, United States Secretary of Commerce; United States Department of Commerce; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; and National Marine Fisheries Service.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard