Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Singh v. Holder, No. 07-73792

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In a petition for review of the BIA's denial of petitioner's application for a hardship waiver of the joint petition requirement for permanent residence, the petition is denied where: 1) the BIA considered hardship to all the family members discussed in petitioner's testimony; 2) because petitioner was a former permanent resident who lacked conditional status when he filed his second and third petitions requesting hardship waivers, he had no status to extend; and 3) even if the immigration judge erred in evaluating the evidence concerning hardship, his errors were rendered harmless by the BIA's de novo review.

Read Singh v. Holder, No. 07-73792

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 6, 2009

Filed January 8, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Berzon

Counsel

For Petitioner:

Martin Avila Robles, Immigration Practice Group, P.C., San Francisco, CA

For Respondent:

Eric W. Marsteller, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard