Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Sternberg v. Johnston, No. 07-16870

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court for violation of an automatic stay, judgment for defendant is affirmed in part where plaintiff violated his duty to ensure that his actions did not prolong a violation of the stay that resulted from a state court motion seeking relief against defendant that plaintiff filed prior to the bankruptcy.  However, the damages award entered by the district court is vacated where defendant could recover as actual damages only those attorney's fees related to enforcing the automatic stay and remedying the stay violation, not the fees incurred in prosecuting the bankruptcy adversary proceeding in which he pursued his claim for those damages.

Read Sternberg v. Johnston, No. 07-16870

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 6, 2009

Filed October 1, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Clifton

Counsel

For Appellants:

Michael W. Carmel, Phoenix, AZ

For Appellee:

Ronald J. Ellett, Phoenix, AZ

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard