Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Anchrum, No. 09-30013

By FindLaw Staff on December 31, 2009 12:24 PM

Defendant's drug and firearm convictions and sentence are affirmed where: 1) the district court's erroneous jury instruction omitting the dangerous or deadly weapon element of 18 U.S.C. section 111 was harmless error that did not affect defendant's substantial rights; 2) the district court clearly separated an officer's testimony into a first "phase" consisting of his percipient observations, and a second "phase" consisting of his credentials in the field of drug trafficking and expert testimony regarding the modus operandi of drug traffickers; and 3) the district court did not abuse its discretion in applying a six-level official victim sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. section 3A1.2 or fail to make the necessary findings of fact when defendant objected to the enhancement in the Presentence Report.

Read US v. Anchrum, No. 09-30013

Appellate Information

Submitted December 9, 2009

Filed December 30, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Tallman

Counsel

For Appellant:

Michael D. Dieni, Assistant Federal Defender, Anchorage, AK

For Appellee:

Christine M. Thoreson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Anchorage, AK

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard