Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Green, No. 08-10149

By FindLaw Staff on January 22, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's wire fraud and bid rigging convictions are affirmed where: 1) defendant's conduct did not need to violate a rule or regulation of the E-Rate educational funding program in order to be fraudulent; 2) even accepting that her ultimate motives were laudable, defendant concealed material facts from the federal government in an attempt to induce it to fund her projects; and 3) the evidence at trial easily supported the jury's finding that defendant participated in multiple bid-rigging conspiracies.

Read US v. Green, No. 08-10149

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2009

Filed January 22, 2010


Opinion by Judge Tashima


For Appellant:

Phillip H. Stillman, Cardiff, CA

For Appellee:

Adam D. Hirsch, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard