Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Knight, No. 08-30372

By FindLaw Staff on September 02, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In defendant's appeal from his sentence of twenty-four months imprisonment and twelve months supervised release imposed after the district court revoked defendant's supervised release, the sentence is affirmed where 18 U.S.C. section 3583(e)(3) does not require a district court to reduce the maximum term of imprisonment to be imposed upon revocation by the aggregate length of prior revocation imprisonment terms.  However, defendant's term of supervised release is vacated where, under 18 U.S.C. section 3583(h), as amended in 2003, the maximum term of supervised release that can be imposed on a defendant following multiple revocations of his supervised release must be reduced by the aggregate length of any and all terms of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

Read US v. Knight, No. 08-30372

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted July 6, 2009

Filed September 2, 2009


Opinion by Judge Pregerson


For Appellant:

Steven C. Haddon, Haddon Law Office, Helena, MT

For Appellee:

Paulette L. Stewart, Assistant United States Attorney, Helena, MT

Eric B. Wolff, Assistant United States Attorney, Helena, MT

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard