Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Lindsey, No. 09-50459

By FindLaw Staff on January 20, 2011 2:24 PM

Bank Robbery Conviction Affirmed

In US v. Lindsey, No. 09-50459, the court affirmed defendant's bank robbery conviction and sentence, holding that 1) defendant's Batson rights were not violated because he was not denied due process or tried before a biased jury; 2) a good faith, erroneous denial of a peremptory challenge does not require automatic reversal; and 3) the evidence was sufficient for a rational jury to conclude that defendant conspired to rob the bank.


As the court wrote:  "This case concerns the proper remedy for a good faith, erroneous denial of a defendant's peremptory challenge. Due to the district court's error in counting, Appellant Jamonn Lamont Lindsey ("Lindsey") received just nine out of the ten peremptory challenges afforded him by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Our circuit precedent provides for automatic reversal under these circumstances. United States v. Annigoni, 96 F.3d 1132, 1134 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc). We conclude, however, that Annigoni was effectively overruled by the Supreme Court in Rivera v. Illinois, 129 S.Ct. 1446 (2009). Accordingly, we reject Annigoni's automatic reversal rule and review the denial of Lindsey's peremptory challenge under a more deferential standard of review. Finding no reversible error, we affirm Lindsey's conviction."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard