Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an action against certain waterfront homeowners for common law trespass and violations of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 and the Clean Water Act, because the ambulatory tideland property boundary came to intersect shore defense structures the homeowners erected, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed in part where: 1) the U.S. owned the tidelands at issue and held them in trust for an Indian tribe; 2) because both the upland and tideland owners had a vested right to gains from the ambulation of the boundary, the homeowners could not permanently fix the property boundary, thereby depriving the Indians of tidelands that they would otherwise gain; and 3) the intent requirement for common law trespass was satisfied because the government requested that the encroaching parts of the structures be removed, but the homeowners failed to do so.
Argued March 13, 2008
Submitted October 9, 2009
Opinion by Judge B. Fletcher
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.