Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's drug distribution conviction is affirmed where: 1) a rational trier of fact could have found the buyer-seller rule inapplicable; 2) defendant and his business partner agreed to the essential terms of the planned transaction; and 3) the evidence was sufficient to establish that defendant knowingly used a telephone to facilitate the distribution of cocaine.
Read US v. Mincoff, No. 08-50058
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted April 14, 2009
Filed July 31, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Rawlinson
Counsel
For Appellant:
Charles M. Sevilla, San Diego, CA
For Appellee:
Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California
David D. Leshner, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: