Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Mincoff, No. 08-50058

By FindLaw Staff on July 31, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's drug distribution conviction is affirmed where: 1) a rational trier of fact could have found the buyer-seller rule inapplicable; 2) defendant and his business partner agreed to the essential terms of the planned transaction; and 3) the evidence was sufficient to establish that defendant knowingly used a telephone to facilitate the distribution of cocaine.

Read US v. Mincoff, No. 08-50058

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2009

Filed July 31, 2009


Opinion by Judge Rawlinson


For Appellant:

Charles M. Sevilla, San Diego, CA

For Appellee:

Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California

David D. Leshner, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard