Skip to main content

US v. Morales, No. 09-30047

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Defendant's supervised release revocation sentence is affirmed where the commission's policy statement concerning whether a sentence reduction was authorized, U.S.S.G. section 1B1.10, was binding, and did not authorize a reduction in defendant's supervised release revocation sentence.

Read US v. Morales, No. 09-30047

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted November 4, 2009

Filed January 5, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Kozinski

Counsel

For Appellant:

Stephen R. Sady, Alison M. Clark, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, OR

For Appellee:

Leah K. Bolstad, Karin J. Immergut and Kathleen L. Bickers, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard