Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Paulk, No. 08-50229

By FindLaw Staff on June 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's drug possession sentence is affirmed, where Defendant was sentenced pursuant to a statutory mandatory minimum, and thus could not be entitled to a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2).

Read US v. Paulk, No. 08-50229

Appellate Information

Submitted February 2, 2009

Filed June 24, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Appellant:

Carlton F. Gunn, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA

For Appellee:

Daniel B. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard